AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/190
1 Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors named by A. Aliyev, Azerbaijan.
*Corresponding Author: Aliyev NA, Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors named by A. Aliyev, Azerbaijan.
Citation: Gafarov TA, Aliyev NA and Hagverdi ER (2021). A Modern Approach to Assessing the Satisfaction of Medical Staff in a Psychiatric Institution with the Quality of Medical Services. J Clinical Research and Reports, 8(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/190
Copyright: © 2021 Aliyev NA. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 28 July 2021 | Accepted: 16 August 2021 | Published: 27 August 2021
Keywords: psychiatric institution; medical staff; Azerbaijan; hospital; survey; regional nature; mental health care
Purpose: The aim of the study is to develop a methodology for assessing the quality of mental health services.
Research material - The participation of psychiatric staff in a sociological study of the availability and quality of mental health services. Refusal of psychiatric staff to participate in the survey. The necessary questionnaires were provided to record the psychiatric staff's responses to the survey. The questionnaires were completed by the surveyed nurses as workplace respondents. In order not to violate the anonymity of the survey, the last name or first name of the respondent should not be indicated in the questionnaire. The study involved 100 people.
Results - A social survey of patients in psychiatric institutions is of great importance and highlights a number of questions aimed at improving it. Thus, in order to improve the work of the hospital, first of all, the results of a sociological survey conducted among psychiatric workers should be taken into account. Employees are very incompetent to involve family members in the treatment of patients - 20%.
Conclusion - There is no doubt that future solutions to the main problems identified in this paper will help improve the quality of mental health care.
Given the importance of improving the quality of psychiatric services, it is important in the modern world to assess the satisfaction of medical staff in psychiatric institutions with the quality of medical services provided there. For this purpose, the staff of the department prepared a questionnaire. The purpose of this study was to find out the opinions of psychiatric professionals about the quality of medical care provided to them and their satisfaction with their activities.
This is necessary to find effective ways to improve the quality of service and perform. The following questions are asked to find out how much you are personally satisfied with the activities of this organization. Nothing you write here will be disclosed and will remain anonymous. When filling out the questionnaire, carefully read the question, all the answer options and translate the number that suits your opinion. We will be grateful if you make any comments at the end of the survey. Thank you for agreeing to answer the following questions!
Name of the institution: Republican Psychiatric Hospital No. 1 of the Ministry of Health of Azerbaijan (hereinafter referred to as “RPX”).
Date: January 2010 - July 2021
Table
Questions Answers in percent | Answers in percent |
How long do you work in this hospital? | between the ages of 5 and 10 - 50% more than 10 years - 50% |
2. How do you get to work? | by personal vehicle -50% in public transport - 40% on foot - 10% |
3. How much time do you spend going from home to work? | 30-60 minutes - 30% more than 60 minutes - 70% |
4. How easy is it for you to get started? | very easy - 40% more easy - 60% |
5. Are you satisfied with your place of work?
| completely satisfied - 50% to some extent satisfied -40% not satisfied at all - 10% |
6. Are you satisfied with your work? | totally agree - 50% somewhat satisfied - 40% not satisfied at all - 10% |
7. Are your expectations for career advancement justified?
| most likely - 50% more likely - 40% difficult - 10% |
8. Do your expectations for career advancement come true?
| fully justified - 50% somewhat justified - 40% no - 10% |
9. Is your job a responsibility?
| very responsible - 70% more responsible - 30% |
10. Are you satisfied with the level of responsibility you have at work? | completely satisfied - 70% somewhat satisfied - 30% |
11. Do you feel overwhelmed by this work? | always - 70% often - 30% |
12. Are you generally satisfied with your relationships with colleagues?
| completely satisfied - 70% somewhat satisfied - 15% to some extent dissatisfied - 15% |
13. How often do you hold staff meetings?
| more than once a week - 40% once a week - 60% |
14. Are you satisfied with the frequency of these meetings? | completely satisfied - 100% |
15. Are you satisfied with the meetings with the staff? | completely satisfied - 60% somewhat satisfied - 40% |
16. Are you satisfied with the efficiency of the meetings? | completely satisfied - 60% somewhat satisfied - 40% |
17. Do you get the necessary support from your closest leader? | always - 60% often - 40% |
|
|
18. Are you satisfied with the support you
| completely satisfied - 50% somewhat satisfied - 50% |
19. Do you think that the heads of enterprises (departments) control you too much?
| always - 50% often - 30% sometimes - 20% |
20. Are you satisfied with this degree of control? | completely satisfied - 50% somewhat satisfied - 30% to some extent dissatisfied - 20% |
21. Are you satisfied with the degree of independence you have at work? | completely satisfied - 60% somewhat satisfied - 40% |
22. Are you satisfied with communication with your colleagues in professional matters? | completely satisfied - 30% somewhat satisfied - 30% not satisfied at all - 40% |
23. Are you generally satisfied with your communication with management? | completely satisfied - 50% somewhat satisfied - 50% |
24. Are you involved in quality improvement decisions in this regard?
| very often - 1; 50% often - 2; 30% sometimes - 4; 20% |
25. To what extent are you satisfied with your participation in decision-making to improve the quality of care? | completely satisfied - 60% somewhat satisfied - 20% not satisfied at all - 20% |
26. Do you participate in the practical implementation of new programs (new activities) in your work? | very often - 50% often - 20% sometimes - 30% |
27. How satisfied are you with your participation in the practical implementation of new programs (new activities) in your work? | completely satisfied - 40% somewhat satisfied - 30% I'm not satisfied at all - 30% |
28. Do you participate in the evaluation of the activities (or programs) of your organization? | very often - 40% often - 30% sometimes - 30% |
29. Are you satisfied with the degree of participation in the evaluation of the activities of your organization? | completely satisfied - 30% somewhat satisfied - 40% I'm not satisfied at all - 30% |
30. From your point of view, how often are your opinions taken into account?
| very often - 50% often - 30% sometimes - 20% |
31. Are you satisfied with the attention paid to your opinion?
| completely satisfied - 50% somewhat satisfied - 30% I'm not satisfied at all - 20% |
32. How satisfied are you with the microclimate in your enterprise?
| completely satisfied - 40% somewhat satisfied - 40% I'm not satisfied at all - 5. 20% |
33. How do you assess the level of friendliness of employees of your company? | very kind - 30% very kind - 40% no friends - 30% |
34. Are you satisfied with your salary?
| completely satisfied - 30% somewhat satisfied - 30% I'm not satisfied at all - 40% |
35. Are you satisfied with the benefits you receive at work?
| completely satisfied - 30% somewhat satisfied - 30% not satisfied at all - 40% |
36. How satisfied are you with the care and attention provided to patients?
| completely satisfied - 50% somewhat satisfied - 40% not satisfied at all - 20% |
37. Do you think that the specialists of your institution listen to the opinions of patients? | always - 50% often - 30% never - 20% |
38. How well do you think patients generally understand their problems?
| very good - 40% pretty good - 40% not very good - 20% |
39. How do you think employees in your organization generally understand what help their patients need? | very good - 50% pretty good - 30% do not understand at all - 20% |
40. Given the general needs of patients treated in your facility, how does the care you provide match them? | completely compatible - 50% to some extent - 20% does not match at all - 30% |
41. Do you think the cost of services provided by patients here is acceptable?
| fully helps - 50% partially helps - 20% does not help - 30% |
42. Are you satisfied with the amount of information provided to patients about their illness? | fully justified - 50% quite acceptable - 30% quite unreasonable - 20% |
43. Are you satisfied with the amount of information provided to patients about their treatment? | completely satisfied - 50% somewhat satisfied - 30% not satisfied at all - 20% |
44. Do you think that the process of enrolling patients from this institution is discussed enough? | completely satisfied - 50% somewhat satisfied - 50%
|
45. Do you think that the process of enrolling patients from this institution is sufficiently discussed with patients? | yes, enough - 50% not enough - 30% not discussed at all - 20% |
46. Are you generally satisfied with the treatment of patients by the medical staff? | completely satisfied - 40% somewhat satisfied - 40% not satisfied at all - 20% |
46. Are you generally satisfied with the treatment of patients by the medical staff? | completely satisfied - 40% somewhat satisfied - 40% not satisfied at all - 20% |
47. Are you satisfied with the amount of services provided to patients of this institution? | completely satisfied - 40% somewhat satisfied - 30% not satisfied at all - 30% |
48. Are you satisfied with the measures taken in this institution to ensure the patient's privacy and peace during treatment (for example, closed doors, no interference, breaks in the process of talking to the doctor)? | completely satisfied - 50% somewhat satisfied - 50%
|
49. Are you satisfied with your privacy practices? | completely satisfied - 50% somewhat satisfied - 50% |
50. Do you think that the staff of this institution is usually attentive to patients?
| always - 50% often - 30% never - 20% |
51. To what extent are you satisfied with the volume of communication between employees and patients? | completely satisfied - 40% somewhat satisfied - 40% not satisfied at all - 20% |
52. To what extent are you satisfied with the volume of communication between employees and patients? | once a day - 50% 1-2 times a week - 50%
|
53. How satisfied are you with the volume of communication between employees and patients? | very often - 50% often - 40% never - 10% |
54. Do patients have a choice of psychiatric institution? 55. If there is a choice, why did they choose this institution? | very often - 20% often - 50% never - 30% |
55. If there is a choice, why did they choose this institution?
| previously treated here - 70% knew someone who had been treated here before - 30% |
56. Are you satisfied with the involvement of relatives in the treatment of patients? | completely satisfied - 30% somewhat satisfied - 40% not satisfied at all - 30% |
57. Do you think that employees should encourage their relatives to take an active part in their treatment? | as a rule, yes - 70% depending on the conditions - 30%
|
58. Are you satisfied with the attitude of your employees towards the relatives of patients?
| I am completely satisfied - 70% somewhat satisfied - 30% not satisfied at all - 20% |
59. Do you think that the staff of the institution is skilled enough to involve family members in the treatment of patients? | I think they are very talented - 40% sufficiently competent - 40% very incompetent - 20%
|
60. How do you assess the general competence of your company's employees?
| very competent - 50% sufficiently competent - 30% very incompetent - 20% |
61. To what extent are you satisfied with the professional competence of employees? | completely satisfied - 50% somewhat satisfied - 30% not satisfied at all - 20% |
62. Do you take the necessary measures to feel safe in the event of an incident of violence during the work of the enterprise? | fully accepted - 50% accepted to some extent - 50% |
63. Are you satisfied with the security measures taken in your enterprise? | completely satisfied - 50% somewhat satisfied - 30% not satisfied - 40% somewhat satisfied - 40% to some extent dissatisfied - 20% at all - 20% |
64. How satisfied are you with your relationship with other psychiatric institutions? | completely satisfied - 40% somewhat satisfied - 40% to some extent dissatisfied - 20% |
65. How do you assess the conditions of stay in your enterprise (bathroom, toilet, food, external and internal condition of the building, etc.)? | good - 80% not very good - 20% |
66. Are you satisfied with the comfort and convenience in the enterprise? | completely satisfied - 60% somewhat satisfied - 20% to some extent I do not agree - 20 |
67. If a friend or relative needed mental health care, would you recommend the company you work for? | of course yes - 70% maybe yes - 30%
|
Table 1: The method of Questionnaires of Cox J., Muholland H An instrument assessment of videotapes of general practitioners performance // British Medical Journal. — 1993. — Vol. 306. — P.1043–1046. Were modifying by Doctors of Medical Sciences T.A. Gafarov, Doctors of Medical Sciences N.A. Aliyev assistant E.R. Hagverdi of the Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors named by A. Aliyev
Thus, the social survey conducted among psychiatric staff is of great importance.
It is proposed to evaluate the results of the survey based on the following positions:
1. Completely or to some extent satisfied with the psychiatric service provided: 70% of the total number of respondents who answered all the questions of the questionnaire positively.
2. Psychiatry is dissatisfied or somewhat dissatisfied with the quality of service: the survey - 20% of the total number of respondents who answered all the negative questions of the questionnaire.
3. The percentage of respondents who are dissatisfied with the quality is 10% who answered the relevant questions negatively.
Thus, 100% of hospital staff have been working for more than 5-10 years, 90% of their plans are satisfactory; 100
1) although the information obtained is of a regional nature, the study of this issue in other countries of the world will be of great importance;
2) the number of participants in the study is limited. Despite the limitation, the study of these issues is extremely important and promising. Finally, it aims to improve care for patients with mental disorders.
The social survey of patients in psychiatric institutions is of great importance and highlights a number of issues aimed at improving it. Thus, in order to improve the work of the hospital, first of all, the results of a social survey conducted among the staff of psychiatric institutions should be taken into account. Employees are very incompetent enough to involve family members in the process of treating patients - 20%. Rehabilitation and labor treatment of patients in particular are at a very low level. However, the material and technical base of the hospital is positively assessed by the majority of all respondents.
There is no doubt that addressing the key issues outlined in the summary will help improve the quality of psychiatric care in the future.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
